|
Truth
is powerful and inbodies those who seek it with an open mind. |
|
|
Born
Alive Infants Protection Act Won't Pass Congress This
Year |
Source:
National Review
|
Date:
October
27, 2000
|
Born Alive Infants Protection Act Won't Pass Congress
This Year The Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2000
will not pass Congress before members adjourn this weekend.
The House version of the bill, which would have provided
federal protection to living, fully born babies who
survive abortions, passed last month by a vote of 380
to 15. While the passage of the live-birth-abortion
bill in the House was a small victory for the pro-life
cause, Democratic members in the Senate short- circuited
it when they objected to a request by Majority Leader
Trent Lott to pass the bill by unanimous consent. Speaking
on behalf of absent members who wanted to offer amendments,
Sen. Kent Conrad of North Dakota objected to the unanimous-consent
request-- and thus postponed the day when Congress would
recognize that babies enjoy full legal protection once
they are born. The Senate bill would have affirmed that
"infants who are born alive are persons entitled to
the protection of the law, and that live birth occurs
whenever an infant, at any stage of development, is
expelled from the mother's body and displays any of
several specific signs of life-- breathing, a heartbeat,
or definite movement of voluntary muscles." As Hadley
Arkes, a professor of jurisprudence at Amherst College,
proposed first in the pages of National Review, a law
must be passed in order to ensure that babies who survive
abortion are protected. Testifying before the House
Judiciary Committee on July 20, Arkes argued that the
Born-Alive Infants Protection Act 2000 "offers the most
modest and the gentlest step that is imaginable in dealing
with the question of abortion; and at the same time
it is the approach that goes most deeply to the root
of things." But given the contentious history of abortion
in our country -- not to mention the ferocity of pro-abortion
groups such as NARAL -- it is no surprise that the definition
of what it means to be a "child born alive" has yet
to be resolved. Or even matter. |
|
|
|
|
|
|